Critical: Prince’s adventures in India

Sources indicate that this event could have a significant impact in the coming days. As we look closer into the details, here is everything you need to know about this unfolding situation.

Key Highlights

INDIANS will have mixed feelings that Prince Andrew, now referred to by the grander-sounding “Andrew Mountbat­ten-Windsor”, did not make a pass at anyone in India, as far as is known, al­though he visited the country on sev­eral occasions.This despite India producing six Miss World winners – Reita Faria (1966), Aish­warya Rai (1994), Diana Hayden (1997), Yukta Mookhey (1999), Priyanka Chopra (2000), and Manushi Chhillar (2017). Andrew meets Indian Navy officers aboard INS Viraat in Mumbai in 2012Punit Paranjpee/AFP via Getty ImagesAlso add three Miss Universe winners – Sushmita Sen (1994), Lara Dutta (2000), and Harnaaz Sandhu (2021). Like his friend, the late Jeffrey Epstein, there has been precious little diversity, equity or inclusion when it comes to his taste in women. The arrest last week on his 66th birth­day of Andrew Albert Christian Edward, The (former) Prince Andrew, Duke of York, KG, GCVO, CD, ADC(P), the sec­ond son and third child of Queen Eliza­beth II, was a godsend to royal corre­spondents. They were given acres of space on the front page to tell the story. Andrew receives a solar lantern in Mumbai in 2010Indraneel Mukherjee/AFP via Getty ImagesIt was a tragedy for royal correspond­ents when Princess Diana died, be­cause she had kept the “ratpack” (as these reporters called themselves) in gainful employment. The monarchy will survive, because it managed to do so even after the abdica­tion of King Edward VIII in 1936. It will also get over this Andrew tamasha. Pow­erful newspapers will ensure the monar­chy lives on because royal scandals are good for circulation. Andrew’s arrest does not pose “an existential threat” to the monarchy. In fact, there is nothing like notoriety to bring more tourist into the UK. Andrew speaks at an event in Mumbai in 2008.Pal Pillai/AFPvia Getty ImagesAnd Andrew did not have “blood shot eyes”, as an overexcited Andrew Marr claimed in a chat with Matt Frei on LBC. As Andrew went home after being ques­tioned by police, the camera flash caught his eyes. But on this occasion, the “red eye” correction was deliberately not done to make him look even more haunt­ed. If Andrew ends up in prison – not very likely – it will not be for any sexual misdemeanours, but for leaking confi­dential information when he was the UK trade envoy. Al Capone was brought down not for murder, but tax evasion. The recent stories about Andrew serve the useful purpose of distracting atten­tion from Epstein’s relationship with US president Donald Trump. According to the New York Times, “the (Epstein) files are peppered with references to Mr Trump, who had been a close friend of Mr Epstein’s until the early 2000s. While Mr Trump has repeatedly downplayed the relationship, the two men bonded over their pursuit of young women.” In Britain, it is more convenient to maintain the focus on Andrew, which is a bit like kicking a dead cat. Andrew stirred up controversy even as a UK trade “special representative”. The late Lord Swraj Paul, who served as an ambassador for British business from 1998 to 2010 and represented Brit­ain on 75 occasions across 30 countries, once joked: “I used to do the same job as Prince Andrew.” With his wife Aruna sitting by his side, Swraj chuckled: “He gets the girls, I got the….” He left the sentence unfinished. Andrew visited India in January 2001 to attend events marking the 50th anni­versary of the Indian Republic. He went again in November 2008 to represent the UK during official trade and investment missions. Another trip followed in March 2010 as a trade envoy, when he met busi­ness leaders and government officials to promote British commercial interests. There was a week-long trip in May 2012 when he was sent by the Queen as part of her Diamond Jubilee celebrations to Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore and Nagaland. The visit would “incorporate a wide range of themes, from inclusive develop­ment and defence ties to the growing business relationship,” the British High Commission commented then in a statement. It added the engagements would il­lustrate how British-Indian relations had changed over the Queen’s 60-year reign. In Kolkata, Andrew visited a vocational education centre run by the Women’s Interlink Foundation. There was a scathing report in 2010 from Simon Wilson after he retired from the British diplomatic service, having served as deputy high commissioner in Kolkata from 2006 to 2009. Wilson remarked Andrew “was a regular visitor to Bahrain during the five years I worked there as Britain’s Deputy Head of Mission (2001-2005). Unfortunately, HRH the Duke of York was more com­monly known among the British diplo­matic community in the Gulf as HBH: His Buffoon Highness. This nickname stemmed from his childish obsession with doing exactly the opposite of what had been agreed in pre-visit meetings with his staff. He appeared to regard himself as an expert in every matter.” Wilson went on: “Colleagues put this behaviour down to an inferiority com­plex about being mentally challenged… his attitude certainly drew attention to the fact that he was usually out of his depth at meetings….He assumed the ti­tle of Special Representative for Interna­tional Trade and Investment in 2001. Officially, he doesn’t get paid for the role, but the style in which I observed him carrying it out beggared belief. He trav­elled with a team of six, including eq­uerries, private secretaries, protection officers and a valet….There was also a 6ft-long ironing board that he insisted went everywhere he went. On one of his visits to Bahrain, I remember the valet carrying the ironing board through the front entrance of the Ritz-Carlton Hotel.” There was a personal anecdote from Wilson: “My wife, who has a passing re­semblance to Sarah Ferguson, shortly be­came the butt of a number of schoolboy jokes by the prince. He even suggested that my wife had ‘touched him up’ under the table. This was our first introduction to his boorish behaviour.” Wilson continued: “Of course, royals love other royals so, from that point of view, Prince Andrew’s role probably works for the Gulf — but less so for other countries. In India, for example, where I saw him in action at the flagship UK Trade and Investment India Business Awards gala in Mumbai in November 2006, people seemed less impressed with minor royals. This was particularly the case after HBH delivered a speech in a leaden tone and then left official guests open mouthed as he skedaddled off to a private party (not in his official pro­gramme) at the home of India’s richest businessman, Mukesh Ambani.” Wilson concluded: “It’s well known by diplomats there are serious shortcomings in HBH’s operations – but who is going to put their career on the line by criticising a member of the Royal Family?” In 2011, the Daily Telegraph published a letter from Stephen Day, 73, a former British ambassador to Qatar and Tunisia, who revealed he had complained about Andrew to the foreign secretary and oth­er ministers: “It takes a lot to bring for­mer British Ambassadors to criticise a member of the Royal Family in public, but it is surely now recognised that the Duke’s activities are doing such serious damage to the Royal Family itself and to Britain’s political, diplomatic and com­mercial interests that an entirely new role should be found for him as soon as possible.” When Andrew was forced to step down as trade envoy in 2011, he declared: “As the evolution of my role continues apace and in order to reflect the changes I have outlined, I have de­cided that the label I gave myself when I began this role of Special Representative has served its purpose and is no longer necessary to the work that I do today and, more importantly, in the future.” What’s happened in the past lends perspective to the current entertaining theatre. Andrew has been damaged goods for a very long time. Britain isn’t broken nor is the country about to be­come the Islamic Republic of Inglistan. We have Coronation Street, EastEnders, The Archers – and Randy Andy.

Furthermore, details emerging from the ground suggest that this is a rapidly evolving scenario. The initial reports focused on the immediate aftermath, but new information is bringing more clarity to the picture.}

The Bigger Picture

To grasp the full scope of this event, it is important to look at the context. In recent weeks, we have seen similar trends in the News sector. Experts believe that Prince’s adventures in India is not an isolated incident but part of a larger narrative.

Analysts have pointed out that historical data often suggests a pattern in such events. However, the scale of this specific development has surprised many.

Expert Analysis & Reactions

The community has reacted strongly to the news. Social media platforms are abuzz with discussions regarding the potential outcomes. While some are hopeful, others are urging patience until more official details are released.

One thing is clear: The topic of Prince’s adventures in India will dominate conversations for the foreseeable future. Stakeholders are advised to keep a close watch on official channels.

Final Thoughts

To sum up, as the situation around Prince’s adventures in India continues to unfold, Bluenton News remains committed to bringing you the latest updates. We encourage our readers to stay tuned for more comprehensive coverage.

For the full original report and verified details, you can visit the source directly: Read More Here.